Rubio's Rancho Alamito
That my friends, within the dots, is what Abel Rubio was alluding to. That was Rancho Alamito.
Mark
Enough Said
Popular posts from this blog
Let's Call a Spade a Spade
Let's Call a Spade a Spade I'm going to keep saying it, till it sinks in. Here we go. If, which it is true, that James Power's grab of 6,642 acres around Copano and Alamita Creeks is inchoate (false), what does that make us (Becerra descendants)? What does it mean? Well, it logically entails that all that land would have been considered public land belong to Coahuila y Tejas. Now, presume no one did anything about it. It would have become public land belonging to the Republic of Texas. Assuming no one stepped in and snapped it up, it would have become Texas lands after the American-Mexican War. It's fine if the O'Connors wanted to purchase it. But they should have seen on the maps that Becerra's were on a large portion of it. Now, assuming that Becerra was never put on the maps because of treachery and deceit (which it was). Then, like the pinche O'Connors, Antonio could have claimed rights to it outright, because the family had been paying taxes on it for...
Rancho Alamito
Rancho Alamito Here's another way of looking at what remained of Becerra's original tract of land. Yellow section is what was sold to Henry Koehler, blue section is what was conveyed. That blue section was conveyed to Antonia de la Garza. Uncolored portion is what I keep pointing to. That was Antonio's property, (rancho alamito), all 2,214 acres. Situated between Alamita Creek and Copano Creek. Mark
Comments
Post a Comment